Abstract:
Migration
has more often been placed as a discourse for the economic growth and
urbanization process however the following paper is an attempt to find a political linkage of migration in
social transformation process arguing that rural, urban to
international migration enhances not only financial capabilities but
also knowledge based political participation. In context to
Key words: migration, politics, urbanization, social transformation, Gurkha Soldiers
Introduction:
Migration
is understood as leaving the origin of birth place and move to another
territory for at least a year at various reasons (excluding internally
displaced)[1]. There are five different modalities to understand motivation of migration. It
includes: economic/behavioural models premised on utility maximization
by migrants seeking better economic opportunities elsewhere; population
pressure ‘push’ known as eco-demography in which migration takes place
at diminishing return of labour; ‘pull’ factor or spatial gravity or
attraction to urban which compensate the transaction cost of moving to
or forth due to the distance; anthropo-sociological model looks at
importance of group network and modernizing influence of migration; and
finally neo- Marxist dependency models that view uneven development and
the articulation of pre-capitalist with capitalist modes of production
as the root cause of migration (Gidwani and Shivramakrishnan, March,
2003. p.186- 213). This paper particularly
concentrates on models premised on utility maximization by migrants
seeking better economic opportunities elsewhere. But it will also
discuss other models of migration in general. On
the backdrop of existing fact the evolution of Dharan is the cause of
utility maximization of rural people who owned a legacy of brave
warriors of their past generation, the hypothesis of this paper is that
rural, urban to international migration enhances not only financial
capabilities but also knowledge based political participation. Nepali
society is not exception of class division which consists feudal
characteristics. The quantity of land holding is also a parameter to
reflect class divisions. The people who joined British Army as labour
oriented migration belong to either middle or poor class. Rigg (2006)
maintains, the division between ‘rich’, ‘middle’ and ‘poor’ relates to
demographic issues connected with the life cycle, and family and
community dynamics (p. 68-82 in Tacoli, 2006). To
the fact that the particular group of people in eastern hills of Nepal
who fought for British in First and Second World War established a new
space for international labour migration with specific profession. The
remittance and returnee migrants with extra skills and knowledge gave a
better livelihood strategy and a solid alternative for other rural
inhabitants. Rigg argues that the distribution of non farm work closely
relates to the stage in the household life cycle that each family finds
itself (ibid, p.73). In context to eastern hills, the households chose
joining British army as non farm work which gave them better livelihood
after agriculture. Later, this specific migration alternative not only
was a better livelihood strategy but became a social capital for better
political participation. They shared live experience of dynamic
European political culture and trend that ongoing in the contemporary
world. They introduced news of developed world through radios. Before
people joined the Gurkha Soldiers, radio was a symbol of high class and
only listened by feudalists. Besides this the major reason of migration
motivation occurred in underdeveloped countries is the diminishing
returns of labour a ‘push’ factor. There are also cost benefit analyses
for individual or households before out migration therefore migration
objective depends on short or long term. In the case of eastern hill of
Nepal the inhabitants neither were influenced by diminishing return of
labour nor had cost benefit analysis before migration. Inheritance of
colonial culture among returnees and their replacement to upper class
has to some extent social, political and economic impacts to sender’s
community.
Primarily
many studies have showed that migration and remittances have negative
influence to the senders society as brain drain, no specific productive
returns because of remittance is spent on daily consumption and
luxurious commodities. This paper also partially argues that circular
migrants and remittances are social capital which induces
infrastructure development and increase political consciousness.
In
the backdrop of varied migration patterns and its contribution to
social transformation, the scale of speedy urbanization spectrum is
well experienced in different geographical areas. In consequence,
agrarian economy is slowly changing into trade and service economy.
Essentially, different factors contributed economic growth but in last
two decades, remittance has become a stable source for economic growth
despite political unrest. It can be claimed that in Nepalese
development process, migration has played an important role in
reshaping new structure in society and political change. Non residents
Nepali (NRN) a kind of migrants which also includes British Gurkha
Soldiers who permanently settled down foreign lands on different
grounds actively supported democratic movements of
Migration Patterns and Political Linkage:
At present,
Historically,
there aren’t so many migration phenomena experienced before 1950
however after the Second World War Nepal’s exposure to external world
and control over malaria in Terai (plain) the phenomena of internal
migration extensively accelerated. K.C. (2003) discusses the census
data of 1961 to 2001 and shows following demographic developments.
According to K.C. (ibid) there were 170,137 inter-zonal migrants which
increased to 445,128 in 1971, 929,585 in 1981 and 1,228,356 in 1991. On the other hand in 2001 the total volume of inter-zonal migration by three ecological zones increased to 1,727,350 persons. To
sum up, these migration proportions, it is clear that the proportion of
migration ratio has tremendously accelerated each year after 70s[2].
The
existing data doesn’t indicate whether migrants are pulled to the
destination or pushed from the origin. The studies show that internal
migration in
There
are also various types of migrations such as internal and
international. Internal migration constitutes in-and -out-migration
between rural-to-rural, rural-to-urban, urban-to rural and
urban-to-urban areas. At first glance, these migration phenomena seem
to be motivated by livelihood strategies however in course of time
these in migrant begin to be active politically in long run. Additionally,
there are various types of time bound migrations such as seasonal
migration followed by temporary, semi-permanent and possibly a
permanent move. It has been viewed that short run migrants have less
influence on politics since these circulating migrants are not well
tracked and are no significant actors in political participation.
Whatever the types of migration in terms of both time and space, except
forced migration due to natural calamity and war, migrants usually
respond to pull and push factors depending upon whether it was an
individual migration or a migration involving the entire family members
and other relatives. Fundamentally, a large majority of migrants would
say they had migrated from the origin as a strategy to better
livelihoods and enhance living standard. In the long run this
livelihood strategy changes to affiliate oneself to political
institutions or become moral supporters. The same things apply in
emigration and immigration in external diasporas. Gidwani and
Shivramkrishnan (March 2003) argue, ‘as more and
more people enter into new work arrangements in rural areas or travel
seasonally to work in informal sectors of the urban economy, their
social relations, their sense of self, their relation to a sense of
place, and their understandings of work undergo changes that are
manifest in identity formation … changes himself, modifies himself, to
the same extent that he changes and modifies the whole complex of
relationships of which he is the nexus’ (p. 190-91). In context to
Migration, Urbanization Process in
|
|
|
|
Migration
to mega cities and slum settlements is closely interlinked which is
exploited for the political gains. Slum settlements are often nuisance
to inhabitants of host cities which often turned to be violent
conflicts. Slum dwellers in the mega cities mostly demand maintenance
of peace and security and redistribution of land for their livelihood.
These slum settlements morally support to the political parties which
voice for them. Analyzing the existing research reports[6]
(figure 1) a question to migrants has been asked as in what condition
they would prefer to go back to their origin. Interestingly 5% of them
responded the condition of peace and security whereas 35% demanded land
and infrastructure development. Figure no. 2 shows a few interesting
aspects. Analysing
the fig no. 2, almost 55% of migration phenomena with people who self
owned home responded the reason of ‘forced out’ similarly 35% of the
same category has put for the earning constraints and 20% of this group
indicates conflict and a very small portion claims to lack of facility.
On the other category of respondents at rented home, a large portion
state to not having facilities and similarly a majority per cent points
at conflict. Excluding other types, these two categories of groups to
some extent refer political relationship with migration phenomena (this
respondents are not internally displaced). Migration relatively happens
with livelihood agenda provided political stability. As Tacoli (2006)
link ups rural urban relations at livelihood issues excluding political
causality the following findings is complex in characteristics (p.3).
She suggests the idea that at first, the livelihoods could be
agriculture or farm activities, thereafter another alternative is wage
on farm, thirdly the non farm economic activities. When all of them
come to an end and there are no chances of sustaining livelihood, the
migration to another potential territory is expected. These conditions
more or less influenced by economic and political policy adopted by the
government. Basically, as it has been suggested that poverty,
inequitable distribution of income, unemployment, difficult livelihood,
and food insecurity are the important causes of internal migration in
International labour migrants and Politics: A Case of Urbanization Process in
In
this chapter, I would like to discuss about international migrants who
participate in the urbanization process through politics. Before
discussing the nexus of migration and urbanization it would be better
to discuss on figures of census data on international migrants. The
latest census has not covered the real international migration data
since there are many emigrants who go for international employment
through informal channel than that of formal. Therefore, the census
data gives a much smaller volume of Nepalese emigrants to foreign
countries. A recent statistics[7]
revealed that the number of people who have gone to various countries
for employment is much higher than the number enumerated by the 2001
census. The figures are as follows - out of
total number, 75,885 went to Saudi Arabia followed by 45,825 in Qatar,
43,831 in Malaysia, 21,905 in United Arab Emirates, 3,831 in Bahrain,
3,014 in the Republic of Korea, 2,668 in Kuwait and 1,566 in Hong Kong,
China. This data doesn’t clearly state the figure of Gurkha Soldiers working in
As
I have already mentioned that government policy on rural and urban
definition also influences the migration trend. The process of defining
rural and urban usually based on availability of basic public services
such as roads, telephone and cable T.V. services, water and sanitation,
schools and colleges and health post or hospitals. Besides those
defining parameters, it is also considered the number of inhabitants in
particular location and consists of potentiality for building further
development. The process of defining urban area sometimes contentiously
debated in the national, regional and local level because it is of
course a matter of public interests. Announcement
of urban area or municipality, it only doesn’t help to raise the value
of land but also increases pressure on infrastructure extension. As
soon as the urban area is defined, the government has ethically obliged
to allocate development budget in that area. For example, returnee
migrants who settled down in Dharan after the place was recognized as
Gurkha Soldiers recruitment centre for British since 1953 invested
remittances in building roads and drainage. This peri urban centre was
supplier of rural agricultural products to Terai in downwards and stock
centre for staple food such as rice, maize, industrial product to
upward villages. As soon as roads were constructed to upward villages
from downward Terai, this peri-urban centre became a major city of
Summary and conclusion:
Migration
has a direct relationship with development process. In the southern
hemisphere where remittance contributes economic growth, circular
migration also creates an atmosphere for active participation in
politics. In case of
References:
Brettell, C. B., and James F. Hollifield (eds.) (2000) Migration theory: talking across disciplines. Routlege.
Conway,
D. and Cohen, J. H. (Jan., 1998) ‘Consequences of Migration and
Remittances for Mexican Transnational Communities’ Economic Geography,
Vol. 74, No. 1 pp. 26-44 Clark University
Gidwani, V, and Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2003 March) Circular Migration and the Spaces of Cultural Assertion. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 93, No. 1 pp. 186-213
Kc. B.K.( Aug. 2003) Migration, Poverty and Development of
Khan, A.A (Oct 1982) ‘rural urban migration and urbanization in
Rigg, J. (2006) ‘Evolving Rural Urban Relations and Livelihoods in
Tacoli, C. (ed.)(2006) The Earth scan reader in rural-urban linkages. Earthscan
Web references
http://www.cbs.gov.np/Population/Monograph/Chapter%2015%20%20Internal%20Migration%20in%20Nepal.pdf retrieved Jan 5, 2009
http://un.org.np/reports/WFP/2005/Internal-Migration-March2005.pdf retrieved on 5 Jan 2009
http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/meetings/migrationaug2003/Nepal.pdf retrieved on 5 Jan 2009
[2] Reference from Kc ( Aug, 2003) ‘Migration, Poverty and Development of Nepal’ paper presented at Economic and Social Commission for Asia Pacific, Ad hoc Expert Group Meeting on Migration and Development Aug 27-29 2003 Bangkok. http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/meetings/migrationaug2003/Nepal.pdf retrieved 6 Jan. 2009.
[3] It
is my personal experience when I worked in a large factory as marketing
researcher and advisor for a whole year. During the period, I also
observed other industries where most of the employees were moral
supporter of the party which their owner was affiliated.
[4] Source http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/meetings/migrationaug2003/Nepal.pdf retrieved 5 Jan 2009
[5] http://un.org.np/reports/WFP/2005/Internal-Migration-March2005.pdf retrieved on 5 Jan 2009
[9] Khanal, P (Jan 5, 2009): ‘Another dismal year 2009 in economy’ retrieved from www.myrepublica.com retrieved 6 Jan 2009.